Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy
You keep assuming that people don't agree with you because they either don't understand you or that they didn't read the treaty. What you fail to realize is that people are capable of understanding your points and understanding the treaty, they just think you're wrong.
|
Yes, that's possible, but the overwhelming majority early on believed that the provisions only applied if the book was not made available in accessible formats, or that price was not an issue, or that it could not be extended beyond the visually impaired, and so on. Some may still believe it given the nature of the arguments constantly reiterated here.
Regardless, thinking someone is wrong because they believe if you make the books available in visually impaired formats, other people shouldn't be allowed to give away free copies to the visually impaired anyway, is a far cry from thinking that someone's belief is morally equivalent to "screw the blind".