Quote:
Originally Posted by zerospinboson
I'm sorry, but how is this an argument against not enforcing audiobook versions for every title? You're only proving my point that forcing the original publisher to provide different versions of each title is less efficient/far more expensive than just leaving those to non-profits (or what/whoever).  |
What you were responding to was the notion that legislation requiring publishers to allow access to books forthe visually impaired was cost-prohibitive. My point was that legislation requiring businesses to allow access to the disabled did not seem to be so; the costs were absorbed.