View Single Post
Old 06-02-2009, 11:24 AM   #78
netseeker
sleepless reader
netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.netseeker ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
netseeker's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,763
Karma: 615547
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Germany, near Stuttgart
Device: Sony PRS-505, PB 360° & 302, nook wi-fi, Kindle 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fake51 View Post
However, I'm not entirely sure that it's the best idea to allow non-profits to do it regardless of whether or not someone else has already done it.
Yes, i agree that other solutions could be better - at least for the authors, publishers and copyright holders. Sometimes i'm just a little bit idealistic.
On the other hand the majority of authors and publishers didn't care much about visually impaired people in the past. It was and is usually just not a profitable market. Hence the statement "no profit now, no loss tomorrow" wouldn't be wrong for most of the authors and publishers - even if non-profits would sell accessible books to visually impaired people without compensating the holders of rights. Yeah, i know...i'm really a little bit idealistic sometimes.
netseeker is offline   Reply With Quote