View Single Post
Old 05-30-2009, 01:51 PM   #38
sirbruce
Provocateur
sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
sirbruce's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,859
Karma: 505847
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Device: Kindle Touch, Kindle 2, Kindle DX, iPhone 3GS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daithi View Post
The blind and non-English speakers are most definately *NOT* at the same level of disadvantage. First, as you yourself pointed out, a non-English speaker can learn the English language. A blind person cannot learn to see.
I already pointed out examples where this logic does not work, which you did not respond to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daithi View Post
However, in terms of reading a book there is another difference between a non-English speaker and the blind. There is a financial incentive to produce books for non-English speakers.
Depends on the language. What about something suitably obscure? And there's only a financial incentive as long as it's not undercut by a law that says they should have them for free.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daithi View Post
In fact, producing books for the blind is almost certainly a money losing prospect, and producing these books is almost always an act of charity, which is kind of the whole point of the exemption.
Again, the proposed treaty would completely force it to be so. It does not have to be so now.
sirbruce is offline   Reply With Quote