View Single Post
Old 05-30-2009, 08:54 AM   #34
sirbruce
Provocateur
sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
sirbruce's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,859
Karma: 505847
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Device: Kindle Touch, Kindle 2, Kindle DX, iPhone 3GS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daithi View Post
Being poor or a non-English speaker doesn't rise to the same level of disadvantage as being blind.
In the case of walking a parking lot, no. But in the case of reading a book that's only in English, the non-English speaker is at *exactly* the same level of disadvantage as the blind with respect to that book. Why not pass a law to make it legal to translate books that the publisher or author won't translate? That's essentially what the blind provision is; translation to audible, braille, large format, or equivalent "language" that they can read.

I suppose the non-English speaker could eventually learn English if they really wanted to. What if they are elderly and learning a new language would be prohibitive for them in terms of time and effort?

What if I write my book in a complex code that only people with 20 years of cryptoanalysis can possibly decipher? Or a dead language only a few experts in the world know? Should not everyone else be entitled to equal accessibility to that work?
sirbruce is offline   Reply With Quote