View Single Post
Old 05-23-2009, 10:40 AM   #101
wallcraft
reader
wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wallcraft ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
wallcraft's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,977
Karma: 5183568
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mississippi, USA
Device: Kindle 3, Kobo Glo HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I understand that the Intel "Atom" CPUs used in netbook devices are pretty low power.
They are low power for Intel chipsets, but don't yet compare to ARM chipsets. Atom is 3-5 W vs < 1 W for ARM. The ARM chips can also suspend to a very low power state, Intel's "Moorestown” version of the Atom (due later this year) is supposed to drastically reduce idle power in an attempt to compete.

However, as you say, with a 10" screen the screen might dominate the power budget. If so, then Atom would make sense.
wallcraft is offline   Reply With Quote