View Single Post
Old 05-15-2009, 11:28 AM   #13
kamm
Zealot
kamm doesn't litterkamm doesn't litter
 
kamm's Avatar
 
Posts: 140
Karma: 134
Join Date: May 2009
Device: Kindle: Amazon's Original Wireless Reading Device (1st generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate the great View Post
Correct. But the DMCA does refer to adversely affected users. In the exception that group is defined as the visually impaired.
I don't see it anywhere neither in the law nor in the exception.

Moreover while section III/A ("Discussion - The Six Exempted Classes") of FedReg (page 68473) clearly cites examples in every case and goes even further to clear up the difference this change brings in the exemption in question ("In other words, if there is no screen reader functionality or no read–aloud functionality, the exemption will apply") it has no word whatosever about limited scope of the exemptions regarding visually impared users (barely even mentions the American Foundation for the Blind, it's named simply as one of the many proponents.)

Last edited by kamm; 05-15-2009 at 11:32 AM.
kamm is offline   Reply With Quote