Quote:
Originally Posted by haertig
It appears the article describing this AI stuff in the original post of this thread may have been written by AI itself:
|
Seemed to me like it was saying, "45 percent of the submissions were rejected, and about 80% *of those rejections* were due to being suspected of being AI-generated."
Is your suspicion that the AI is pulling two different percentages from different places, or that a human author wouldn't have omitted the implicit "of those rejected"?