View Single Post
Old 04-12-2026, 05:22 PM   #3
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 51,274
Karma: 179232776
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Personally, I have no objection to an author using AI as a tool in brainstorming, outlining, continuity, etc. I do object where pretty much the entire book is "created" by the AI which is happening all too often in the current market.

OTOH, AI detection tools are still notoriously bad at detecting AI created content. I still have a bad habit of occasionally submitting content from ebooks I own to those tools just to see what the results are. In my last set of tests using Winston AI, Originality.AI, Grammarly AI Detector and GPTZero, two of them suggested that chapters from 4 books in Andre Norton's Witch World series were the product of AI. I hadn't realized that AI was around prior to 1963! None of the 4 were able to detect AI content with high reliability and the number of false positives was unacceptable for detecting the use of AI by highschool students which was my area of interest in the use of AI.
DNSB is online now   Reply With Quote