Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
I tend not to differentiate between what might deserve to be called "piracy" and what might not. If casual sharing violates copyright, then I consider that behavior to be piracy. And if DRM can be effective in preventing that sort of "casual" piracy, then I don't considerer it utterly ineffective against piracy. Others' mileage on this will no doubt vary.
My main point was that using Tor's DRM-free approach to argue that it doesn't contribute to more piracy (casual or commercial), or lost sales is a bit unprovable. It only proves that Tor is satisfied with their sales numbers after going DRM-free.
|
Tor said it. So I'd believe Tor on that. Why would you not believe Tor?