View Single Post
Old 03-30-2026, 01:11 PM   #84
JSWolf
Resident Curmudgeon
JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.JSWolf ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
JSWolf's Avatar
 
Posts: 82,752
Karma: 152504945
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roslindale, Massachusetts
Device: Kobo Libra 2, Kobo Aura H2O, PRS-650, PRS-T1, nook STR, PW3
Quote:
Originally Posted by ratinox View Post
This is a misunderstanding of an aspect of oversampling, a misunderstanding that snake oil grifters have capitalized on heavily. Have you ever seen a CD player with a label that says something like "96KHz Oversampling"?

When you reconstruct an analog signal you can get aliasing artifacts, high frequency noise, in the output stage. In principle, analog filters remove this noise, but these filters are relatively expensive compared to the rest of the system. What 96KHz oversampling does is tell the DAC stage to behave as if the sample rate is 96KHz instead of 44.1KHz. This pushes aliasing artifacts very far above the limits of human hearing. Then a low-pass filter at 22KHz cuts off all the artifacts without needing costly analog filters. Simple, effective, and much cheaper to manufacture than costly analog noise filters.
But I'm not talking of oversampling. I'm talking of a native 24-Bit/96KHz.
JSWolf is offline   Reply With Quote