View Single Post
Old 03-30-2026, 11:17 AM   #81
ratinox
Guru
ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 850
Karma: 11789444
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Somewhere in Time
Device: Forma, iPad Mini
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
So, the question isn'i whether or not 24 bits can encode audio more accurately, with much better SNR and much better dynamic range (it definitely can), it's whether or not this improvement is actually detectable when using real-world amplifiers and speakers etc., and when listened to by human ears. I've yet to see any convincing tests which indicate that people can tell the difference, so 24-bit seems pointless as a distribution format.
Absolutely. The extra headroom is invaluable in the studio. It's pointless for consumer media.
ratinox is online now   Reply With Quote