View Single Post
Old 03-29-2026, 08:07 AM   #62
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 798
Karma: 11569273
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth View Post
Sampling at many times the final sample rate allows for a simpler analogue pre-filter as there must be no input above 1/2 the sample frequency. This also allows more content up to the sample frequency as an analogue filter can't be like a cliff. It's not a sharp cut off. Then the input can be digitally filtered to 1/2 the final sample rate.
Most recording studios work this way - much higher sampling rate for recording and mixing, then a decimation filter to reduce the sampling rate.

Because offline digital filters don't have the be causal, it's easier to get a sharp cutoff without nasty phase distortion.
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote