View Single Post
Old 01-24-2026, 04:52 AM   #116
jugaor
Enthusiast
jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.jugaor for a long time would go to bed early.
 
jugaor's Avatar
 
Posts: 42
Karma: 17648
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lima, Peru
Device: Kindle 10Gen / Kobo Aura HD / Nook STR
@KevinH: Thank you so much for your quick replies!

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinH View Post
- No BOM is needed or used for utf-8 encoded files…
I understand your well-founded reasons. The BOM suggestion wasn't specifically for me, but for the millions of Win-Excel users who just double-click and that's it. It was just a suggestion to save you potential "It's not working properly" reports
No problem for me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinH View Post
- selection by copy to a clipboard is restricted to a single element, I will look into changing that if easily doable.
THANK YOU!!! That was on my list of suggestions. Check. Much more convenient this way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinH View Post
- the status line's length will always change. It did for changing line number and column numbers before this change.
"Ideally", the width of both values ​​could be fixed (five digits?), so that the Line: Col: headers wouldn't jump when moving the cursor (but that might be asking too much, hehe).

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinH View Post
As for the status line order, that question was already asked in an earlier post in this thread. I argued against it. But if most testers would prefer the order to be:

CODEPOINT NAME (U+0000) - Line: 1, Col 1 .

I would consider it. You are the third to ask for that change. We need to hear from other testers to get a consensus.
Thanks for considering it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinH View Post
- What reason do you have from disabling the character name? What benefit would it give to most users? IMHO, Sigil already has too many settings right now, so adding one to disable a new feature is probably not going to happen unless there is a negative impact on editing speed, but none has been detected or reported. So there are no downsides to adding that info to the status line.
Again, the request wasn't specifically for me. But whenever an application adds a feature, someone might prefer to disable it: because they don't find it useful, because of limited screen space, etc. Providing an option to disable it, if it's not difficult to implement, is always welcome.
That's all, no other interest on my part.


Thanks again for your time and consideration!
jugaor is offline   Reply With Quote