View Single Post
Old 01-22-2026, 06:18 PM   #32
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 49,975
Karma: 178398936
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cactus Chef View Post
That seems like way too much to be just watermarks. Maybe different image resolutions/compression algorithms being used?

I'd be happy to contribute to the research effort if we could find a target book that wasn't Rowling...
I think the main issue there is the size of the image files. The cover.jpg in the SDRM file is 2,090,855 bytes while the image file in the ADRM file is 740,754 bytes. Oddly, most of the image files are different between the two versions though the resolution is the same with the SDRM having 3,404,872 bytes total in images while the ADRM has 1,978,103 bytes in images.

As another oddity, the xhtml files in the SDRM have the DOCTYPE declaration while the xhtml files in the ADRM do not.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote