View Single Post
Old 01-03-2026, 10:19 AM   #90
un_pogaz
Chalut o/
un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.un_pogaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
un_pogaz's Avatar
 
Posts: 543
Karma: 718860
Join Date: Dec 2017
Device: Kobo
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
Maybe Count pages could be itngrated into calibre so we can set the count to different formats based on the format. For example, ADE page number for ePub and calibre's count for Kindle formats.
Reponse to this since it was not.
No, probaly not. First one because it doesn't really make sense to have different algorithms for such similar format.
And frankly, the ADE pages is not that great because it use the xhtml file size, wich lead to count also indent space and the tag itself. It not that much, but can be better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kovidgoyal View Post
No DOCX metadata has only a page count if word bothers to update it, it doesnt always, sometimes leaving it wildly off and other software does not set it. Thus I chose not to use it.
Is realy a shame that we can use the metadata page count of DOCX (and probably ODT if so).
On one hand, these file types are a hybrid between static like PDF and fully reflowable like ePub, so their page count has a sens... but since we cannot be reliable on it, yeah better to processes them as fully reflowable.

Last edited by un_pogaz; 01-03-2026 at 10:28 AM.
un_pogaz is online now   Reply With Quote