Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth
No, you are not, because your opinions mostly seem aligned with corporations and you constantly denigrate people that have an alternate opinion, and even ignore facts.
|
I'm sorry. But that just means you're not really paying attention. I personally have not found any use for AI as of yet. That may change in the future, but maybe not. Right now, I have it disabled in just about every place I've encountered it. The difference is, I'm not raving about it. I'm letting people choose differently than me. You don't. So what you've mistakenly identified as some sort of alignment with corporate love for all things AI is merely a willingness to let
reasonable people make their own decisions about how they use AI (or don't use it) without preaching at them. People who tend to be unreasonable about it get my attention, however.
Which means a find offense with anyone who tries to bully an open-source dev into making sure that no one gets to make a decision like this for themselves. By declaring for everyone that it has no place in a piece of free software.
You've also completely missed the point in saying that I'm denigrating people. I'm not. I simply choose to challenge
you whenever
you invariably try to force your unreasonable aversion to anything called AI onto everyone else. Unlike you, there are many AI threads around here I take no interest in. But you can bet whenever you try to decide for everyone what does or doesn't belong in freely developed open-source software, I'm going to take notice. I'm not going to call you names, I'm not going to attack you personally, but I AM going to make sure you know--in no uncertain terms--that I think you're you're dead wrong. Nothing more, nothing less.
Stop assuming that people who disagree with you on this are mindless corporate wonks who want everyone to love all things AI. Talk about denigrating.
