View Single Post
Old 11-11-2025, 07:07 PM   #7
issybird
o saeclum infacetum
issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.issybird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
issybird's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,599
Karma: 236955213
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: New England
Device: Mini, H2O, Glo HD, Aura One
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
Can we see photos of both devices with the front light off to see how they compare?
I will do it tomorrow, but why does it matter? That seems an artificial standard to me. I only read with no light when I’m in direct sunlight. This setting (11) is standard for me when reading indoors in either daylight or lamplight, my most likely situation. And my point was that the setting was the same for both devices; I wasn’t trying to make the case for one by ramping up the light on that device, just as I didn’t make the font bolder. For me, it’s more important that they compare under typical usage. It would be similarly arbitrary to compare images at maximum light, which I’d never use anyway.

What do you think of the pictures as they are? Sufficient clarity? Readable? My own take is that they were so similar as not to make a difference outside of a preference for background shade..
issybird is offline   Reply With Quote