View Single Post
Old Yesterday, 01:21 PM   #3279
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 788
Karma: 10535853
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth View Post
A tri-colour R G B LED with no phosphors would be near zero CRI
Note that higher CRI (80 to 95) have lower efficiency than low CRI of 50.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_rendering_index

So an R G B LED source can be used for LCD backlights, and projectors onf any kind as those are not room illumination, but playing back a signal created by filtering the image to match the average human eye response to three channels, either R G B or brightness and two chroma channels. As the filterin was done at the camera or scanner, the display can use narrow R G B at approximately the peaks.

Pure R G B sources are terrible for actual general lighting.
The multiple quantum well monolithic white LEDs can get a CRI into the high 80s, which is fine for lighting.

They're still (as far as I know) not ready for commercial use, but they do exist and I suspect it's only a matter of time.
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote