Quote:
Originally Posted by TadW
I repeat: Are there any studies that prove your claim?
As a reminder, here is your claim: Despite the procedure concerns outlined above, Wikipedia is no more or less accurate than other general encyclopedias.
Nothing in the Wikipedia article you referred to would validate your claim. What the article merely points out is that there is still plenty of controversy open for discussion.
|
There are studies cited in the Wikipedia article that validate my claim. The fact that there's still "plenty of controversy" doesn't change this; there's plenty of controversy over many claims that have lots of evidence to support them.