Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB
In my case today, the path is not shared. It is strictly pedestrian and bicyclists and scooter users are required to walk and push their vehicles. One path in a nearby city has mini-speed bumps on a couple of pedestrian only paths. For people in wheelchairs they are not much of an obstacle since they tend to move slowly. Unless you are running while pushing your baby buggy, the kid might feel a bit of rocking but nothing that unpleasant. If you are on a bicycle or scooter and going fast, yeah, they are a bit painful much like hitting a sleeping policeman at 50kmh instead of the recommended 15kmh. I watched one young driver in a Tesla hit one at close to 50kmh. The sound effect was interesting for certain values of interesting involving MacPherson struts testing their limit.
|
Not sure but I don't think Tesla has MacPherson suspensions: those are one thing, alike mechanical/membrane keyboards, LCD/CRTs, that Wikipedia itself mentions as a cheaper way to produce as a pro.
Imho Telsa would use double-whishbone ones. A needle in a haystack research on cars within brings an effort at the Toyota Celica (1992), Honda Civic (same years circa), Renault 19 16V
y that so beatiful Clio 16 iirc.
Fantastic suspensions, fantastic suspensions
.
Quote:
|
They also provide increasing negative camber gain all the way to full jounce travel, unlike the MacPherson strut, which provides negative camber gain only at the beginning of jounce travel and then reverses into positive camber gain at high jounce amounts.
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double...one_suspension