View Single Post
Old Yesterday, 04:48 PM   #10
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,828
Karma: 169712582
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth View Post
If a company has a US HQ, it doesn't matter where the data is, the USA Government can demand it, and more easily if it's not involving a USA Citizen.

That's why MS, Google & Amazon etc "Cloud" services assurances to EU are regarded as worthless.
I do remember one case where a judge in the USA demanded information from Microsoft which was stored in a Microsoft data center in Ireland. Microsoft appealed the decision and won on appeal when the Second Circuit appeal court ruled in their favour. See The Microsoft Ireland Case: A Brief Summary for a much shortened version.

There are several similar decisions regarding other requests for information not stored in the USA. Where I was last working, one reason for choosing the cloud services we did was the assurance that our data would never be stored on a server located in the USA.

With the current American administration, the likelihood of such a demand being accompanied by threats is pretty high regardless of the precedents.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote