For me, this would not add anything to my use of the calibre viewer. While I have to admire the work you have put into this, given the number of times that AI generates results that are totally out of touch with reality make me want to run screaming. Looking back over the last few years on MobileRead, there have been quite a few discussions of using AI to 'improve' calibre, none of which amounted to much.
As in one recent discussion (General Discussions => Using AI for reading ), in
message #45:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB
Just for the heck of it, I had 10 2 page maximum summaries of the first 11 chapters of 20 books generated. About 50% of them weren't bad, 35% were iffy and 15% had me questioning if I existed in the same universe as the AI.
|
And at this time, I can't kid myself it is getting better. Going by OpenAI's own testing as reported in an article on LiveScience, their newer reasoning models hallucinate more often with o3 and o4-mini hallucinating 33% and 48% of the time.
AI hallucinates more frequently as it gets more advanced — is there any way to stop it from happening, and should we even try?