Hello everyone.
I've been using both lines for many years:
Code:
page-break-after: avoid;
break-after: avoid;
(in that order) with success in all tests (except, of course, the limited Cool, FBReader, Readera, etc.).
That's why this remark intrigues me:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RbnJrg
and now ereaders based on webkit/readium finally gave support to "-webkit-column-break-after: avoid"
|
@RbnJrg, what devices or apps have you found that work with
-webkit-column-break-after and don't honor
break-after ? (I haven't found any yet.)
Since I prefer to avoid proprietary instructions (unless absolutely necessary), is this really necessary or are you just being overly protective?
Gracias!