View Single Post
Old 07-13-2025, 08:47 AM   #85
rcentros
eReader Wrangler
rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rcentros's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,902
Karma: 52566355
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Voyage
Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
When I look at the table of contents of my current ebook, the cover, title page, dedication, chapters, ... are all listed.
The Table of Contents is not the cover.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
Since you brought up the cereal box... What is the inside the box: the content (probably a plastic bag, maybe a toy, the cereal, ...); people eat the cereal, some may pick out the "candy" in the cereal. What's inside an ebook, the content (table of contents, cover, chapters, afterword, acknowledgment, author photo, ...), some may read some parts and skip other parts.
The contents of a cereal box is the cereal, not the picture on the box or the plastic bag that contains the cereal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
Just because I may not care about some of the content doesn't make it "not content" to me.
I was talking about the cover of the book, not the Table of Contents or the front matter, or the Index, or the Author's blurb or anything else inside the cover of the book, which are various parts of the content of the book.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John F View Post
Again, IMO, YMMV.
I understand opinions, but I was expressing my opinion specifically about the cover of the book — not various types of book content inside that cover. You've basically created a straw man argument here.
rcentros is offline   Reply With Quote