Quote:
Originally Posted by Quoth
It's not "just copying". But calling it "training" (or machine learning) is a lie, Marketing-Speak, and the content for LLMs is copied, but just not in a normal easily accessible replay with sane source identification (which would be more useful as then you'd have a decent interactively driven search engine)*. The entire LLM part of AI is dishonest and misleading. No computer system learns or is trained in the sense the words are traditionally used. The entire industry segment is like Humpty Dumpty in Alice through the Looking Glass. They are using anthropomorphic phrasing and descriptions that are dishonest or at best misleading.
[* Something I proposed about 25 years ago. I was a professional, qualified programmer and had studied AI for over a decade by then.]
|
We get it. You hate anything called AI or Machine Learning and consider it all nothing but intellectual property theft. But repeating your opinion ad nauseum is not going to make it the law of the (any) land.
Your semantic, scientific, moral and legal objections have been noted. ... and noted, and noted. Mission accomplished. You've spoken the loudest and the most often on it. How about a new crusade, please?