View Single Post
Old 06-27-2025, 11:06 PM   #32
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,424
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcentros View Post
Out of curiosity, what would "embracing AI" look like for publishers?

You asked Apache, who may have a totally different answer. But this web page gives one model:

HarperCollins, Microsoft AI deal sets first public price for training data
Quote:
The agreement calls for Microsoft to pay a fee of $5,000 per title, split 50-50 between the author and HarperCollins. The deal allows the AI developer to use the data for a period of three years. Payment would be made directly to the author and would not count against a title’s advance.
This deal is surely unavailable to self-published authors. I wonder if it requires a publisher with an attorney who can credibly threaten to sue.

Last edited by SteveEisenberg; 06-27-2025 at 11:09 PM.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote