View Single Post
Old 06-20-2025, 03:08 PM   #24
KevinH
Sigil Developer
KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 8,937
Karma: 6361444
Join Date: Nov 2009
Device: many
Quote:
Originally Posted by philja View Post
In the MacBook, after the failure to run Sigil Beta 2, I went back to Sigil Beta 1 which draws Apple's wrath over the fact of a dangerous download from the internet.

I jumped thro their Security hoops and Beta 1 runs fine.

Beta 1 was also a tar.xz download and only three days ago.

The MacBook sees some difference between Beta 1 and Beta 2 which Apple does not like.
That is increasingly strange. I downloaded that tar.xz directly from the github CI build and its sha256 was an exact match for what I posted on my personal repo.

So nothing was added or lost on upload.

If that build truly is broken in some way, then it is the github CI build process that is involved. I will look into it.
KevinH is offline   Reply With Quote