View Single Post
Old 06-19-2025, 04:20 PM   #2944
nana77
Guru
nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.nana77 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
nana77's Avatar
 
Posts: 610
Karma: 860470
Join Date: May 2025
Device: Kobo Forma
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
That problem you've had with USB ports is not something that USB-C will solve. You can still have the same problem with USB-C ports. Maybe it was user error.
The ones I was meaning are the previous DC power jacks, and micro USB (ah, dear Nokia N900).
USB-C seems more solid and large; there are several graphic tablets that had that DC's jack fell.

Sometimes it's what's wrote on the cable's box that lacks informations, or them are not well explained, onto USB-C ones (imho); but there is a new standard coming out LOL (GPMI, one-cable standard taking on HDMI, DisplayPort, and Thunderbolt); and so now -again- I would ask myself if that new protocol supports:
Quote:
One will have a standard USB-C connection (known as GPMI Type-C), while the other appears to use a new connection standard (GPMI Type-B). Type-C cables will support 96 Gbps of data bandwidth along with up to 240 watts of power, while Type-B doubles both of these numbers to 192 Gbps and 480 watts.
is it plausibile to say that those Panasonic Viera (Plasma TV) weren't consuming too much.
nana77 is offline   Reply With Quote