Quote:
Originally Posted by RbnJrg
I didn't think about it before, but that also means that the repo-supplied 2.5.1 (with QT_QUICK_BACKEND=software) is also faster than the appimage. If so, then there is also a bug in Qt 6.8.2.
|
Not necessarily. There are huge changes between 6.8.2 and 6.9.0. It's entirely possible the AppImage is just as fast as the repo version of Sigil when Arch's system Qt was 6.8.2/3. It's also very likely there's performance overhead involved with an app that's being run from a compressed filesystem.