View Single Post
Old 05-17-2025, 08:28 PM   #14
KevinH
Sigil Developer
KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 8,911
Karma: 6120478
Join Date: Nov 2009
Device: many
Okay I tested the following in Sigil 2.50 (pre-release):

The xhtml file was:

Code:
  <p>Lorem “ipsum dolor” Jack said. “</p>

  <p>Lorem ipsum dolor said. “</p>

  <p>Dolor amet said. “</p>

  <p> 0xxxy </p>
And the search string I had to modify to make it a finite quantity:

Code:
(?<!”\s\w{1,6}\s)said\. “
And when I run it the find only goes to the second and third lines.

So as far as I can tell with these examples, all is working.

But again this version of Sigil has a newer version of PCRE2 (10.45) than the version that came in Sigil 2.4.2 (10.44), so since you are seeing something different I would guess that there was a PCRE2 bug in 10.44 that got fixed.

If it is any help, we are hoping to do final updates of the translations this week and will try to make a full release by next weekend if both of us can work it into our schedules.

If you desperately need something immediately, I can generate a CI build of current Sigil master (it will be missing translations in most languages) and make a link available to you.

But please test your Sigil 2.4.2 build and let us know if it fails these very specific tests (ie. if there was a PCRE2 bug).

Last edited by KevinH; 05-17-2025 at 08:37 PM.
KevinH is offline   Reply With Quote