View Single Post
Old 02-13-2025, 05:56 AM   #22
ChrisHistorian76
Connoisseur
ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ChrisHistorian76 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 62
Karma: 4282588
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Alexandria, VA USA
Device: Onyx Boox Nova Air & Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by salamanderjuice View Post
Seems a bit ridiculous not to consider model output in the ruling. You could train a model to output a number between 0 and 1 on how similar a text document is to Harry Potter. Obviously that would need to be trained on Harry Potter but the output would have nothing to do with the content in Harry Potter. Would that require a special license to make?

There are researchers who do similar things. Can't imagine the nightmare of trying to check if you have the proper "training model" license for everything in your corpus. Like here's a paper where they use content from fan fiction sites in machine learning models to glean insights:

https://link.springer.com/article/10...78-024-01224-x

Who is the correct rightsholder here?
I think the answer to your question on fanfic, in the US at least, is "it depends."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_...th_fan_fiction
ChrisHistorian76 is offline   Reply With Quote