Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
Sorry. But I think what you actually meant to say was that "that also reveals that your interpretation of the legal ramifications of how LLM works does not match my own." Because let's face it. Your interpretation of AI and LLM in general are a bit more philosophical (not to mention semantic) than most's.
|
No, that's your biased opinion of interpreting what I write.
You are acting as an apologist for an environmental and knowlege damaging scam.
It's cheek to give your twisted interpretations of what I've written. Let people draw their own opinions.
See
Quote:
Taggart :donor:
@mttaggart@infosec.exchange
The BBC studied the use of its content in LLM output. It found that 91% of the output had mistakes. 51% of the mistakes were "significant."
I will not give up this fight. This technology is detrimental to human knowledge.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/document
|