View Single Post
Old 01-06-2025, 09:06 AM   #2247
ratinox
Guru
ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ratinox ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 775
Karma: 10526954
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Somewhere in Time
Device: Forma, iPad Mini
Quote:
Originally Posted by Solitaire1 View Post
The last sentence brings up an issue with USB-C: Incompatibility. There was a YouTube video where the Host had a collection of USB-C cables. The problem was: Some only work with a specific device. I thought a selling point of USB-C was: You take a USB-C cable, plug it in to a device and it works. I've had that issue recently where a device I had didn't work with the USB-C cable I had. I had to find the specific cable that came with the device.
You'd think that because consumers have been lead to believe that USB-C is a single standard. It isn't. It's a collection of loosely related standards for power, low speed data, mass storage, and other capabilities. And then there's Thunderbolt which uses USB-C ports but isn't USB-C: while a Thunderbolt cable can work as a USB-C cable, a USB-C cable will *not* function as a Thunderbolt cable. And some USB-C cables are really only good for power: while they can carry data they are much slower than "proper" USB data cables due to fewer data strands.

USB 4 is supposed to make these problems disappear by unifying these standards.
ratinox is offline   Reply With Quote