View Single Post
Old 05-04-2009, 06:21 AM   #98
GeoffC
Chocolate Grasshopper ...
GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
GeoffC's Avatar
 
Posts: 27,599
Karma: 20821184
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Scotland
Device: Muse HD , Cybook Gen3 , Pocketbook 302 (Black) , Nexus 10: wife has PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirbruce View Post
If you don't think children should get anything, then you should be arguing for a 100% inheritance tax. And copyrights are just a small portion of that problem; you have bigger fish to fry.

If you think children should get something, then you have to treat copyrights fairly the same way you treat the income from any other assets after death like stocks, annuities, property, ownership of businesses, etc.

So those who continually bring up the notion that children don't deserve anything from inherited copyrights are only derailing the discussion.

can readily see why you call yourself 'provocateur' ....
GeoffC is offline   Reply With Quote