There is NO intelligence at all in AI. Most of the terminology is actually a lie.
No-one has a clue how to write an intelligent program. Nor can people exactly agree on what intelligence is, except we recognise it. Rooks might be more intelligent than dolphins or chimps. Language (not vocabulary) is puzzling too. Parrots and rooks can learn words and what they refer to, ditto chimps and signing. But none have language.
You can get a so-called AI to return the "training" data, It's not even training, that's misleading. It's a specialist distributed database to store the content and then pattern matching is used. The companies have admitted they want and need entire works.
See
https://www.theguardian.com/film/202...-in-ai-warning
I'm not convinced there is a threat to creatives. People I know forced to use AI by their managers say it's junk. It may be a bubble. It is needing huge resources to get the current poor results. They don't want to pay for content because already it's cripplingly expensive.