View Single Post
Old 05-03-2009, 07:53 PM   #97
sirbruce
Provocateur
sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sirbruce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
sirbruce's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,859
Karma: 505847
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Device: Kindle Touch, Kindle 2, Kindle DX, iPhone 3GS
If you don't think children should get anything, then you should be arguing for a 100% inheritance tax. And copyrights are just a small portion of that problem; you have bigger fish to fry.

If you think children should get something, then you have to treat copyrights fairly the same way you treat the income from any other assets after death like stocks, annuities, property, ownership of businesses, etc.

So those who continually bring up the notion that children don't deserve anything from inherited copyrights are only derailing the discussion.
sirbruce is offline   Reply With Quote