Quote:
Originally Posted by ownedbycats
Since field_list_count() is faster, it'd be ideal if it works for this use-case.
|
I noticed it sort a tad faster than list_count, initially.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ownedbycats
Yeah, I used to use a manual integer for #timesread too, but then I realized that the list_count composite would work instead.
|
Oh, I see! I remember now that you've shared the list count template with me and now I can picture another advantage over the integer: it means one less action on my double-click event chain. Will do some tests with the composite instead, thanks.
edit: I just tested list_count instead of integer on 7.20 stable and it meant a visible speed improvement on the double-click chain. Running from source I can use field_list_count but the timings are different from regular use.