View Single Post
Old 10-09-2024, 04:15 PM   #11
chaley
Grand Sorcerer
chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.chaley ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 12,447
Karma: 8012886
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Notts, England
Device: Kobo Libra 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by ownedbycats View Post
FWIW, I've switched away from a composite column and instead use this saved search:

Code:
template:"program: annotation_count()#@#:n:>=1"
I'm unsure whether this is faster or slower - there's sometimes a slight but noticeable lag when executing the search.
That search should have no performance advantage over a composite, other than it being on demand vs on display. To be faster you would need to use a caching python template.
chaley is offline   Reply With Quote