View Single Post
Old 05-02-2009, 02:23 PM   #11
CleverClothe
Guru
CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CleverClothe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 618
Karma: 493394
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Device: iRex iLiad, Onyx Boox 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirbruce View Post
Just because it's not a random sample doesn't mean it's useless. First, you'd have to posit a good theory why the self-selected website responses would be different from random. Then, you'd have to show how that difference would be statistically signifigant. And even then, a large difference wouldn't invalidate broad conclusions. We can be reasonably confident that it's not 80% under the age of 40, for example.
You haven't taken a statistics course have you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sirbruce View Post
First, you'd have to posit a good theory why the self-selected website responses would be different from random.
Self-selecting sites are by definition different from random. If they were the same as random, they wouldn't be self-selecting.
CleverClothe is offline   Reply With Quote