View Single Post
Old 08-28-2024, 05:04 PM   #10
John F
Grand Sorcerer
John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.John F ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,962
Karma: 71261339
Join Date: Feb 2009
Device: Kobo Clara 2E
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsem View Post
It's the publisher contracts, not Apple. Publishers won't work with retailers that won't let publisher set prices.

Apple wanted to have fixed set of prices like they did for MP3's. $12.99, $9.99 etc. when they launched iBooks for iPad. $12.99 was still a lot less than new release pricing for hardbacks at that time. They didn't really know what they were doing (and still don't, when it comes to ebooks). Publishers went along with it at first, they didn't know what they were doing either, but were hoping for some competition with Amazon and ebooks were still kinda a new thing.

It wasn't long before they decided that neither model suited them and that they didn't want any constraints on pricing.
I think the U.S. justice system disagrees with you. They were found guilty of engaging in a conspiracy that violated federal antitrust laws? I think the DOJ thinks Apple did more then just "want"".

Last edited by John F; 08-28-2024 at 05:06 PM.
John F is offline   Reply With Quote