View Single Post
Old 08-24-2024, 12:07 PM   #523
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 49,360
Karma: 174632678
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarmat89 View Post
That content was maliciously changed to present it as copyrighted content produced by Amazon. It is their right to remove the content they own with unclear licensing status.
What is the logic behind stating that using EBOK as the book type make it copyrighted content produced by Amazon? And even stranger claiming that that was a malicious act. The books I used for testing were PD so no copyright.

Are you claiming that despite Amazon licensing/selling many books produced by other publishers that since those books show an EBOK booktype that they are Amazon produced content to which Amazon now owns the copyright?

Amazon did state that they would not remove books from Kindles again back when they removed 1984.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarmat89 View Post
Every publisher produces copyrighted content by transforming another copyrighted content under a license from the author or another copyright holder.
The copyright resides with the copyright owner. Allowing Amazon to publish your copyrighted material does not grant Amazon a copyright.

Last edited by DNSB; 08-24-2024 at 12:09 PM.
DNSB is online now   Reply With Quote