View Single Post
Old 08-12-2024, 06:34 AM   #40
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,709
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
I would rather let users tweak the dock close icon sizes themselves on Windows (with qss). They don't look tiny on my Windows machines (one laptop and one virtual) and I dislike the notion of hard coding sizes.

I used our pre-exising dark icons to fix Qt's broken hardcoded xpm ones (they look horrible with dark themes), but that's about as far as I'd like to go down the rabbit hole of trying to "fix" the inherent Qt6.5+ fusion dark theme's inadequacies on Windows for everyone. Nothing is going to work for everyone's dpi and/or fractional scaling settings.

Never mind: I just noticed that this is with our Classic dark theme. My bad. Perhaps we simply remove the 9 pixel qss from SigilDarKTheme in Qt6.7+? It seems to work Ok in the inherent dark theme without any pixel size specifications.

Last edited by DiapDealer; 08-12-2024 at 06:39 AM.
DiapDealer is online now   Reply With Quote