Quote:
Originally Posted by rcentros
How the book is "classified" means nothing. It's its content that matters.
|
Of course the classification matters. Books are classified based on their content, and the fact that Maas's books aren't classified as erotica means that other people by no means agree with your assertion that her books are pornographic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcentros
I'm not going to quibble over pornographic vs "bad taste" or "erotica."
|
Neither am I. I used the word "erotica", because that's what the pornography section of the Kobo store is called. 'A Court Of Thorns And Roses' does not appear in that section, thus demonstrating that Maas's books are in fact not pornographic, regardless of how much you dislike them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcentros
When sexual acts are described in the detail that they were described in the book I scanned, whether it's smut, porno, erotica, "in bad taste" or however you want to describe it, it definitely is not something that should be available to a 14 year-old child in their school library.
|
That's your opinion. As a parent, you would have the right to prevent your minor children from reading it, but you don't have the right to use censorship to prevent other people's minor children from reading it.