Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB
I have read 9 of those books. I would not describe any of them as smut. That you would use smut and sexually explicit to describe them suggests you have not read them.
|
As mentioned, I've scanned one of Maas' books. I've seen examples of the explicit material in it — and a quick search showed that it was the book was infested with it. I'm not going to quote passages here, but if it's not smut, smut doesn't exist. Definitely not something I would want my 14 year old child to read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB
Dating yourself with that choice of magazines. So now we have jumped to conflating those books with magazines with nekkid wimmin. Might I ask why you left Playgirl and it's ilk out? Have you actually read any of those books?
|
So what? I don't keep up on current smut magazines. Sue me. But I see you avoided the real question. Would you condone placing smut magazines (whatever the current ones happen to be) in school libraries? Yes or no? Because I sure wouldn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DNSB
I ran into quite a few homeschooled children who had transferred into the public school system. Many of those experiences were enough to make me regret my career.
|
I've run into a lot of kids who have gone through the public school system who are a confused and drug-addled mess, and who can barely read. It's enough to make me very happy that my kids never went to public school. But I guess not reading may have been a plus since their school library was probably filled with smut.