View Single Post
Old 05-01-2009, 02:37 AM   #31
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6charlong View Post
And why do “flammable” and “inflammable” mean the same thing? Shouldn’t they be opposites?
Nope. The "in" in this case is not a "negative", but has pretty much the same meaning as the English word "in".

"Flammable" is from the Latin verb "flammare", which means "to set on fire".

"Inflammable" is from the closely related, but subtly different, verb, "inflammare", which is "in" + "flammare", meaning "to set a flame to something" - ie, the actual act of lighting a fire.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote