View Single Post
Old 04-30-2009, 06:46 PM   #24
wodin
Illiterate
wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
wodin's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,279
Karma: 37848716
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Sandwich Isles
Device: Samsung Galaxy S10+, Microsoft Surface Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gudy View Post
Which is almost completely irrelevant, because DPI are useless as a measure for display quality unless you also give the viewing distance. So let's have a look at this.

Some quick measurements show that my monitor has ~100 dpi at a viewing distance of ~70 cm. My ebook reader has ~170 dpi at a viewing distance of ~40 cm. Which results in almost exactly the same angular size of a pixel (which is the measure that actually matters, ergonomically speaking) in both situations (100 dpi * 70 cm / 40 cm = 175 dpi).

And I sure wouldn't mind a higher resolution in both cases, either.
Unless of course your eyeballs are as old as mine. If my arms were 70 cm long, that’s how far my viewing distance would be.

That's why scalable fonts (big ones) are much more important than screen resolution.
wodin is offline   Reply With Quote