Quote:
Originally Posted by Timboli
No I didn't, as all the significant detail was in the article, going by what I read.
I took it as most would, that the article was a concise summary of any linked papers. So to go further for me, would be kind of unnecessary as I am not a scientist, and so any further interpretation by me, could be flawed due to personal bias on my part.
So in essence I leave it up to the experts ... or those more expert than me.
|
I guess I have my doubts then, as there seems to be a discrepancy/"interpretation" between the article and the linked study?