View Single Post
Old 06-22-2024, 08:41 PM   #6
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,564
Karma: 169115148
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Last time I looked hardlinks on a NTFS volume can only access files not folders and they can't reference files on a different volume. Reparse points/junctions can operate between volumes but they are a pain since they can not reference files nor can they reference a network volume. Symbolic links under NTFS were designed to be compatible with Unix style symlinks but require NTFS 3.1+. Personally, I found symbolic links to be a total PITA since the backup programs we were using either copied only the file path and not the data or copied the data every time a symbolic link was accessed during the backup.

On a FAT32/exFAt/etc. volume, moving a file between directories only moves the directory reference not the file data so not that much speed difference.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote