View Single Post
Old 04-03-2024, 02:55 PM   #152
DNSB
Bibliophagist
DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DNSB ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DNSB's Avatar
 
Posts: 46,600
Karma: 169712392
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Device: Kobo Sage, Libra Colour, Lenovo M8 FHD, Paperwhite 4, Tolino epos
Looking at both the old Apprentice Alf and the newer NoDRM repositories, there seems to no issues crediting pseudonyms. Perhaps something as simple as "Our thanks to the all the creators and maintainers of DeDRM for the chance to charge you for what they are giving away for free"?

Out of curiosity, where in the GPLv3 license which seems to be the most popular in the DeDRM components does it say that if I don't use my real name, I do not deserve to receive credit for my work.

Of course, the big nasty is this:

Quote:
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same freedoms that you received. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights.

Last edited by DNSB; 04-03-2024 at 03:02 PM.
DNSB is offline   Reply With Quote